In these accusations, he had claimed I was a "Former EDL member".
I want my response to be short, with evidence as this "individual" doesn't deserve anymore attention than is required to make him look incredibly silly.
1- The EDL don't have membership so that lie can be easily disproved
2- I have opposed the EDL for multiple years. As is evident if you type in my username with the words "oppose EDL" on Twitter.
A couple of examples (note dates of tweets):
...and some more tweets going back earlier...
3- As for Daniel Pitt running SlatUKIP. His own mother verbally abused me on Facebook after I had a picture he had photoshopped removed by Facebook (falsely implicating someone of racism) resulting in him being warned as to his future conduct on Facebook.

4- How come the only 2 accounts online to falsely accuse me of being a "former EDL member" are Daniel Pitt in his article, and SlatUKIP on Twitter. Both making the same aforementioned mistake that the EDL do not have a membership and making the false accusation.
Here:
...and here...
It will be very interesting to see if Mr Pitts website allows my comment:
Update 01/10/2015 - My comment on the article was unsurprisingly declined:
It's also interesting to note that the wording of the article has been changed in the clearest example of backtracking you will ever see:
From this:
To this:










Very good points you wrote here..Great stuff...I think you've made some truly interesting points.Keep up the good work.
ReplyDeletelinen chute